I’m not a formal theorist, but a spec/vibe coder working at the boundary where abstract geometry meets messy human judgment.
I’m building a toolset called iDIG that explores how Hilbert-space-style representations might be used practically—not to optimize decisions or rank outcomes, but to support healthy engagement between people, resources, and opportunities. My work shows up in applied domains like recruiting, prospecting, and in the future - social services coordination, where classical ranking systems and Boolean logic often collapse nuance too early and introduce distortion.
As I’ve been reading through the work here, I find myself wondering whether quantum theory—and Hilbert space in particular—might also be meaningfully applied outside strictly scientific study, to help align signals in human communication and foster healthier forms of engagement. Is there an opportunity to leverage vector representations to move coherence between people closer to their agency, rather than having it primarily orchestrated for their attention?
What draws me to Hilbert space isn’t the math in isolation, but its capacity to hold ambiguity, preserve relational structure, and allow understanding to emerge before judgment. In iDIG, observer intent isn’t treated as noise—it’s modeled as a first-class input that reshapes the space instead of forcing premature collapse.
I’m here to learn, compare notes, and engage with others thinking about Hilbert space beyond purely formal or purely metaphorical uses—especially where ethics, coherence, and real-world decision systems intersect.
Looking forward to the conversation.
